NEW DELHI: Virat Kohli and his men made history as India registered their maiden Test series victory on Australian soil after the fourth Test at the Sydney Cricket Ground was drawn due to rain on Day 5 on Monday.

SCORECARD

Cheteshwar Pujara was declared the Man of the Match and the Man of the Series.

Rain prevented any play on Day 5 with Australia needing to bat out the last day to salvage a draw.

India won the series 2-1 with victories in the first Test in Adelaide by 31 runs and in the third Test in Melbourne by 137 runs to retain the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. Australia had won the second Test in Perth by 146 runs.

No Indian team had managed to win a Test series since they began touring Australia in 1947-48.

The hosts were 6/0 at stumps on a weather-affected Day 4 after being forced to follow-on by India.

Australia were dismissed in their first innings for 300 in reply to India's 622/7.

India had taken a stranglehold after making Australia to follow-on at home for the first time in 30 years on Day 4.

Play started almost four hours late due to rain, with the home team resuming on 236/6 after lunch.

But needing a win to level the four-match series, Australia crumbled to 300 all out, compounding the misery after some soft dismissals by the top order.

Kohli sent them straight back into bat -- the first time Australia have been asked to follow on at home since Mike Gatting's England did the same in 1988, also in Sydney.

Marcus Harris, not out two, and Usman Khawaja, unbeaten on four, survived four overs before tea was taken early for bad light. They didn't come back with play abandoned for the day.

India's spinners had picked up five of the six wickets on Day 3, but under overcast skies when play finally began on Day 4 Kohli took the new ball straight away and threw it to his pacers.

It immediately paid dividends with Pat Cummins, who scored a gutsy 63 in the Melbourne Test, lasting just three balls, clean bowled by Mohammed Shami without adding to his overnight 25.

The recalled Handscomb began with purpose, confidently stroking two boundaries to move to 37 before swiping at a Jasprit Bumrah delivery and dragging it onto his stumps.

That brought Nathan Lyon to the crease but he only lasted five balls, out lbw to a full toss from Kuldeep Yadav.

Hanuma Vihari dropped a sitter when Josh Hazlewood was on nought, and it proved costly with the tailender putting on 42 with Mitchell Starc for the last wicket before he fell to Yadav, who was the pick of the bowlers with 5-99 -- his second career five-wicket haul.

SYDNEY: Australia were forced to follow-on on home soil for the first time in 30 years after being dismissed for 300 as India went for the jugular in search of a maiden series triumph Down Under on the fourth day of the final Test on Sunday.

SCORECARD | BLOG

Openers Usman Khawaja (4) and Marcus Harris (2) safely negotiated four overs until bad light and light drizzle forced an early end to an already heavily rain-disrupted day just before the re-scheduled tea break.

Australia will resume on six without loss on Monday, still without a century in the series and 316 runs adrift of India's mammoth first innings effort of 622-7 declared.

The tourists, leading 2-1 in the four-Test series, only need a draw to secure a breakthrough triumph in Australia but skipper Virat Kohli did not hesitate to send the hosts back in when they fell well short of the 423 runs needed to avoid the follow-on.

Play at the Sydney Cricket Ground had finally got underway after a rain delay of almost four hours and India needed just 80 minutes to take the last four wickets at a cost of 64 runs.

Mohammed Shami immediately took the second new ball and removed Pat Cummins's off stump with the sixth delivery of the day to dismiss his fellow paceman for 25.

Peter Handscomb, recalled for his ability to play spin, followed for 37 after adding nine runs to his overnight tally, dragging the ball onto his stumps to give quick Jasprit Bumrah his first wicket of the match.

Nathan Lyon faced just five balls before he was adjudged lbw to fellow spinner Kuldeep Yadav for a duck, a decision Australia decided against reviewing despite a question mark over whether the ball would have hit the stumps.

Josh Hazlewood was dropped by Hanuma Vihari off Kuldeep's bowling when he had yet to score and he and fellow tailender Mitchell Starc (29 not out) fought a dogged rearguard to put on 42 for the final wicket.

Left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep (5-99) finally got his man to secure a second five-wicket haul in his sixth Test, though, trapping Hazlewood leg before wicket for 21, in a decision confirmed after a review.

England were the last team to force Australia to follow-on at home in the drawn 1988 Sydney Test, a result the hosts are unlikely to repeat unless the weather intervenes decisively.

LIVE SCORECARD | BLOG

5:15 am If no further rain, play on day four will begin at 0530 IST





5:05 am Rain has stopped, ground staff peeling off the covers.



4:45 am Bit of rain now in Sydney as the SCG ground staff brings the covers on.

4:30 am Bad light delays start.



4:25 am Hello and welcome to day four of the fourth and final Test between India and Australia at Sydney.

With a bit of rain forecast on the Sunday, following a shortened third day due to bad light and rain, India would want to make the most of the active sessions the Test would see on its last two days. Play was scheduled to start half an hour early today due to early stumps on day three, but the light is not good enough to get on the park.

The visitors took control of the match on Saturday after spin twins Kuldeep Yadav (3/71) and Ravindra Jadeja (2/62) reduced the hosts to 236/6, still 386 behind India's 622/7 declared.

The not-out batsmen on the crease -- Peter Handscomb and Pat Cummins -- will thus have a task at hand once the day's play gets underway.

Day 4 Round-up

Australia's batting woes returned on the third day of the fourth Test on Saturday and they had slumped to 236/6 when bad light and rain brought an early end to their response to India's mammoth first-innings tally of 622/7 declared.

The tourists only need a draw to claim a first series win in Australia and the home side's hopes of preventing even that faded as they blew a solid start to lose five wickets after lunch.

Marcus Harris, Marnus Labuschagne, Shaun Marsh and Travis Head were all dismissed after lunch and captain Tim Paine followed soon after the tea break.

Peter Handscomb, unbeaten on 28, and fast bowler Pat Cummins, who had made 25, were at the crease when the rain clouds gathered over a Sydney Cricket Ground swathed in pink for the McGrath Foundation breast cancer support charity day.

Most of the Australian batsmen made starts but only opener Harris was able to get past the half century mark -- his 79 the highest score by the home side in a series during which India have pillaged five centuries.

SYDNEY: Australia's batting woes returned on the third day of the fourth Test on Saturday and they had slumped to 236 for six when bad light and rain brought an early end to their response to India's mammoth first-innings tally of 622-7 declared.

SCORECARD | BLOG

The tourists only need a draw to claim a first series win in Australia and the home side's hopes of preventing even that faded as they blew a solid start to lose five wickets after lunch.

Marcus Harris, Marnus Labuschagne, Shaun Marsh and Travis Head were all dismissed after lunch and captain Tim Paine followed soon after the tea break.

Peter Handscomb, unbeaten on 28, and fast bowler Pat Cummins, who had made 25, were at the crease when the rainclouds gathered over a Sydney Cricket Ground swathed in pink for the McGrath Foundation breast cancer support charity day.

Most of the Australian batsmen made starts but only opener Harris was able to get past the half century mark -- his 79 the highest score by the home side in a series during which India have pillaged five centuries.

The left-hander showed plenty of intent but just when it seemed he could be heading for a maiden Test ton he calamitously played the ball onto his own stumps off the bowling of Ravindra Jadeja.

India's disciplined pace attack played a leading role in the victories in Adelaide and Melbourne that gave the tourists a 2-1 series lead coming to Sydney but it was the spinners who did most of the damage on Saturday.

Jadeja (2-62) also accounted for Marsh, who must surely have exhausted his supply of Test recalls after departing for eight having left his bat hanging to gift Ajinkya Rahane the simplest of catches at first slip.

Rahane had to work considerably harder for the catch at short midwicket that dismissed Labuschagne (38), diving low to his left to grab the ball with both hands off the bowling of quick Mohammed Shami.

Kuldeep Yadav (3-71) made Travis Head his second victim of the day shortly before tea, the batsman charging down the track to take on the left-arm wrist spinner only to send the ball straight back to him for the catch.

Paine gave the 24-year-old his third wicket, a peach of a delivery that clean bowled the Australia captain through his gaping gate for five.

The surface that India's batsmen had plundered almost at will for two days was still offering little movement for the bowlers and the Australians will be cursing themselves for some soft dismissals after the solid start to the day.

The openers had put on 72 when Usman Khawaja, moved up from number three to replace the dropped Aaron Finch, miscued a slog off Kuldeep to depart for 27 in the opening session.

NEW DELHI: The controversy over an in-form Mihali Raj being dropped for India's semi-final clash vs England in the recently concluded ICC Women's World T20 has snowballed into something much bigger.

With a three-member panel being formed to appoint the next Women's team coach a pandora's box seems to have been opened. Leaked email exchanges between the two members of the Supreme Court appointed Committee of Administrators, Vinod Rai and Diana Edulji suggest that the two just don't see eye to eye, at least when it comes to this issue.

On July 18 2016, the Supreme Court had ruled in favour of implementing a majority of the Lodha Committee proposals. On January 30 2017 a four member Committee of Administrators was appointed to oversee the implementation of the reforms. That committee has subsequently become a two member panel, with two members leaving. Vinod Rai and Diana Edulji are the two remaining members.

TimesofIndia.com spoke to former Chief Justice of India, Justice (retd) RM Lodha, who headed the committee that tabled the report for reforms in the BCCI.

Excerpts...

Do you think when Ramachandra Guha and Vikram Limaye left the Committee of Administrators (CoA), their positions should have been filled by appointing others?

This could have happened if the Supreme Court was informed that the two member committee is not being able to take unanimous decisions. They are court appointed administrators, they have to implement the court orders. The court would never think that they are divergent in their opinions. They have to implement the Supreme Court orders. That is their brief. Things have gone haywire, it's unfortunate.

How happy or unhappy are you with the way the reforms for the BCCI that the committee you headed recommended and those that were cleared by the Supreme Court are being implemented?

The BCCI is not serious about implementation of these reforms. Otherwise it should have been done long back. They have fought their case before the Supreme Court. Whatever pleas they had wanted to take, they have taken before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has extensively heard them and now they have no choice. Once the Supreme Court has passed the order, it's binding on all concerned. It's the law of the land. Our report was accepted as the law of the land. I am really surprised. They just can't bypass the Supreme Court order. There maybe a delay in something, but surely a Supreme Court order has to be implemented. And that was the brief that was given to the Committee of Administrators and unfortunately that has not yet happened.

What is your take on the way the Committee of Administrators (CoA) is functioning right now?

Whether it is functioning in the right way or not, I have my own doubts. Look, a two member committee has to take unanimous decisions. Even in the Supreme Court and the High Courts, it happens - two Judges sit in court. Chief Justice and junior Judge or senior Judge and junior Judge. There may be a difference of opinion. But the presiding Judge cannot say, 'no what I say is right'. Matter has to be referred to a third Judge. The problem here is it's a two member committee. There is no question of any reference etc. So all decisions have to be unanimous. Because look, the Chairman is first among equals. He does not have any overriding powers. He does not have a casting vote type thing. They (two members of the CoA) must sit together. It's a small two-member committee. Sit across the table and sort out the issues. Whatever you agree on, only those decisions should be taken.

What do you make of the emails that are being exchanged between the two members of the Committee of Administrators to communicate?

This should never happen. Look they (Vinod Rai and Diana Edulji) are both members of the committee. They are not rival parties who are building some records, so that in future should a litigation take place, these records will help them. No it doesn't happen. They are not rival parties. They are two legs of the same body. Where is the question of e-mails? Unless somebody is 10000 miles away and can't meet physically. Both are in India. They must meet, meet regularly. Why should they exchange e-mails at all?

There seems to be a big difference in opinion, particularly when it comes to the appointment of the next Women's cricket team coach

Look, I don't know when it happened. Three months back, two months back, four months back. But once they found that on any issue they were not able to take a consensual or unanimous view they must have moved the Supreme Court, saying 'it's a two member committee. We have come to a situation where (there are) certain decisions in which our views do not match, therefore kindly appoint a third person.' The Supreme Court would have appointed a third person, so that the majority view would have been final. Or the Supreme Court would have made it a 5 member committee. Or they would have reconstituted the body. All options were available with the Supreme Court, if the court was informed, that 'there are divergent views in the two member committee on several issues and we can't take decisions.'

Do you see the Supreme Court stepping in?

How does SC know about this? Unless the SC is told about this. Ultimately the brief given to this committee was to implement the reforms which were accepted by the SC. That was the whole idea. Two years have passed. Lots of issues have been taken up, some are minor, some are major. There are divergent views. They don't see eye to eye, just exchanging e-mails. Situation has come to that pass. The only course available, legally was to approach the SC and say these are the practical difficulties. The committee is not able to function. The right thing has to be done in the right way. You can't do it in a wrong manner. The committee has to be functional. The decisions have to be in accordance with the law and that is decision by majority. It's a two member committee, both have equal rights to express themselves and if they are not able to find a common path, obviously one cannot say that 'I will take this decision and that will be final.' If two members give different directives to the BCCI or its officials, how will such decisions be binding and effective?